someone gotta tell me what MW2 and MW3 are in this context, because im constantly thinking about modern warfare. i know its been said already but I cant find it
Calm down, everything's fine, I think he was just a snoopy onlooker, he wasn't involved in the deliciousness.
Without account? WeTransfer would work (just select link instead of mail), maybe there are better ones not sure
Dunno if you’ve noticed but almost all the mother OC’s are married, including the one in his large project. Even his old game Tentacular is about slowly breaking a married woman and then fucking her during a webcam call with her husband.
Except...it isn't. The horse isn't stealing her. Its a horse that was set to have a breeding date with another horse and just banged the closest female there was at the time. There wasn't some master plan. And as I said before, this was a gold nomination, so the next time Anne features, this may not even be referenced again, because it could be someone else's idea.
It looks like you're trying to say things, as if they make it not count for some reason. I'm not sure where you're from, but this is really simple, if your woman fucks an animal, most guys would not be happy with it.
Except she isn't Cole's. Anne's bio goes into her character, namely that she really loves taking care of her family. It just goes into the porn logic territory of what 'taking care of their needs' entails. There isn't a couples relationship there to be broken, just a mother taking care of her children.
If you want to see the mom be fucked by a horse, that's fine, but understand how stupid it is for you to tell other viewers how they should feel. You keep going on about things as if they matter outside of these 5 minutes shorts.
Stop being an insecure bitch. can't handle watching her son seeing her fucked for 2 seconds. Your dad NTR'ed you when he slept with your mother to create your siblings.
It isn't cucking though. Ya'll convince yourselves that NTR/Cucking are eternally linked together and that's just not how it works. This way of thinking is what led to this thread getting locked for like a year because people had such a terrible interpretation of this particular short.
Because your understanding of NTR remains strictly within the bounds of either "stealing the main female character" or the main female character declaring a preference for the partner with whom she is neglecting the main male character. It's fine if you choose to see it that way. However, in my many years of watching and reading this kind of material, "NTR" has expanded to include sexual scenarios that involve the main female character which do not include an established partner--e.g. a husband or boyfriend--or the main male character. Because it's the main male character which presumably serves as the entry point for the male audience. You're arguing only a "semantic" position based on a technicality. It's considered NTR not because her son is "her husband" or that it was previously established that they were in a "committed exclusive relationship," but because the narrative of the previous two works in which the male audience attached themselves focused on the sexual relationship between a mother and her son. And therefore, any other sexual relationship which goes beyond the scope of that which attracted the male audience is considered NTR, whether the female character is "stolen or not." Because "cheating" on the MMC is like cheating on the audience. Limiting "Creativity" (Really?) has nothing to do with it.
These things have categories and tags for a reason. Infidelity is not a catch all, especially not for one where the current pair are already cheating.
This doesn't mean much of anything, because words are malleable and subject to change. You may not like it more than I do, but it has happened, does happen, and will happen again. And arguing on a lexical technicality doesn't move the needle, because if we're going to be technical, NTR, is merely a contraction of "netorare" which applies to all lovers of a cheating partner.
Except hypocrisy is not the measure. Is it hypocritical to consider the mom fucking a horse "cheating" while fucking her son "isn't"? Yes. I don't think anyone questions that she's cheating on her husband with her son. That's not the issue. It's that she has had sex with someone/something other than her son (her husband notwithstanding.) It's not, "oh she's cheating," and therefore it's automatically "NTR." It's that her sex with the horse constitutes a faithlessness to her relationship with her son, the main male character with whom the audience predominantly identifies.
I'm aware.
You're missing the point, entirely. The female perspective doesn't matter in this case. The reason Harem stories aren't considered NTR because again, the audience is overwhelmingly male. Harem works usually include the participation of all female characters, whereas NTR merely relegates the main male character to either an unsuspecting dimwit, or a forlorn voyeur. You're attempting to create some gender-parity in works that are created to appeal particularly to a male gaze. Ask yourself: why were the two characters, mother and son, as opposed to "boyfriend and girlfriend"? I would imagine that it wouldn't have been particularly difficult to age up the male character. Because Jackerman wanted to ingratiate his works with the incest crowd. The mother and son don't have to be boyfriend and girlfriend; they don't have to be husband and wife; tautologically, they're parent and child. That is their relationship; that is their bond. The incest genre merely sexualizes this bond. And to have a character, human or not, have coitus with the mother after an already established relationship with the son, the character with whom, and I'm assuming this, the majority of the audience engaged this work (otherwise why approach the story using the incest theme?) constitutes a betrayal of the son, and by extension the audience. That is the basis for the transmuted NTR description.
Bears repeating that the shorts are voted by popular vote. So regardless of how much this place had a meltdown over it, it clearly didn't affect the mind of the supporters for them to have it be made. And remember that Cole being there wasn't even in the original script, Jack chose to present it as an option, and it was voted for.
